Mistress Talia: a sadistic domme

I don't understand why it seems people think strap-ons are exclusively to be worn by ladies. Sure, I enjoy wearing one, there's nothing quite like fucking a sub.

But sometimes, I like to *be* fucked. If a scene is intended for me to *use* the submissive for my pleasure, one of the options open to me is having him wear a strap-on.

I think some people have the notion that any sexual contact between a dominatrix and a submissive is "not allowed." That is often true when seeing a professional dominatrix, and I don't want to say anything here that gives the impression that those ladies offer sexual services.

But I see my puppy on occasion and that is a personal relationship, not a professional one. As such, what is truly "dominant" is defined simply by... whatever *I* want.

For some reason, it seems there's a stereotype that dominants don't allow themselves to be penetrated. Nonsense. I can maintain dominance in any number of situations, it's not about the specific activity I choose to engage in. If *I* am doing it, it's a dominant activity; period.

Let's get the rules straight here. If I fuck you with a strap-on, I'm the domme. If you fuck me with a strap-on, I'm the domme. Clear? OK.

So there's two scenarios in which I enjoy being fucked with a strap-on. First one is beginning before puppy has gotten hard, just putting the thing on over his built-in equipment. As such, the strap-on harness and dildo act as a chastity device, physically preventing him from getting hard. I find that an enjoyable mindfuck, to make a sub fuck me while he remains in chastity.

The second scenario is more likely early on in a sub's training, when he doesn't yet have much control over his orgasms. If a sub cums before I was done using his penis, a strap-on comes in handy.

In the vanilla world, when the man cums, sex is over. In my world, sex is over when I choose - and whether a man cums or not is not necessarily relevant to my pleasure.